By design, we are failing

It was only a matter of time before this happened. That is to say time doesn't really matter, so it wasn't so much a matter as in an issue as of no matter at all. Time and matter being separate constraints you see. Or perhaps not, I forget.

But the point in had, or rather the rule is that there is only so much that can occur before it leads to excessive self indulgence, infact perhaps everything that occurs is always by its nature indulgent, or it would not have occurred in the first place. And this leads us to a discussion of the performance as communication , rather than introspection. Of a duality between commutator and the recipient of the communication, accurately or otherwise. Like all communication it requires a bare minimum of two persons to exist. not one, but two, or more perhaps, more often infact. Therefore if the performance is an introspective one, it fails to communicate it fails to exist.  and therefore wasn't a performance in the first place.

by design we are failing. 

ooze ooze ooze

many things in life are a duality. but what's a duality if its not an endless compromise. and what's a compromise if its not a result where neither side gets what they want. I'd like to believe in anarchism I really would. but we tried it once and it didn't turn out well. in a group there is always a leader. and in a duality there is always a master and a slave. granted they may be both master and slave at the same time , or at different times, competing or complementary. but the duality is always a certainty. and the one thing about a duality is its neither one thing nor the other yet both at the same time. quite uncertain if you will. a certain uncertainty. of yin and yang, or ones and zeros, or haves and have nots. Him and Her

life would be simpler if there was no duality. but life would be more cruel. at least for one side , so this simplicity we cannot have. unless we are to spend our lives eating one big misogynistic cheese pasty. and that would be a terrible affair